OJBC promotes a more effective and efficient justice system through improved sharing of information and automation of business processes. The Consortium seeks to accomplish this by lowering the barriers to entry, and by creating a way for jurisdictions to reuse what others have done at very low cost. The OJBC also wants to ensure that further usage and expansion of the OJB software is also shared back with the community, so that the entire nation can benefit from new capabilities. Open source licensing helps to accomplish all of these aims (see below).
The OJBC also seeks to accelerate justice information sharing by enabling government agencies—and industry partners—to leverage a common platform for building information exchanges. The Consortium believes that the nation will be better off investing resources in building exchanges rather than re-inventing and re-building core infrastructure components that could easily be shared.
OJBC’s approach and philosophy emphasizes collaboration, sharing of information exchanges, reuse of capabilities, and industry standards. Read to learn more, and to find out how Consortium members have successfully implemented exchanges in their states.
Open Source License
The core Open Justice Broker functionality is licensed as open source, which means that all licensees—
- can access all core OJB components—such as federated query, subscription/notification, event reporting, and more—at no cost.
- may modify these—as long as the modifications are shared back with the community via the OJBC.
- may redistribute their modifications—as long as the modified source code is made available under the open source license.
Licensees do not have to become members of the OJB Consortium to access the OJB source code—but membership conveys additional valuable benefits. Learn more
Collaborate/Reuse/Share
The OJBC approach embraces a collaborative approach to information sharing:
- Jurisdictions may reuse the capabilities already on the OJB platform, and customize them as needed.
- Jurisdictions may contribute exchanges from their own projects for reuse or enhancement by others.
- Any future expansion of the OJB software—whether by OJBC members or others—is shared back with the community. In this way—
- all OJB users contribute to the evolution of the OJB platform
- the entire nation can benefit from new capabilities designed on the OJB platform
- OJBC supports the advancement of justice information sharing through collaborative reuse of low-cost technology.
Industry Standards-Based
A core OJBC philosophy is to develop solutions that incorporate industry and justice standards, which enable linkage of disparate justice systems—from law enforcement records systems, to prosecution and court case management systems, to corrections information systems, and beyond. The OJBC:
- Seeks to eliminate the need for each state, local, or tribal jurisdiction to start from scratch to identify justice information exchanges
- Supports effective security and privacy practices, leveraging the Global Federated Identity and Privilege Management (GFIPM) guidelines, and the Global privacy guidelines
- Implements core integration features, such as subscription/notification and federated query capabilities
- Implements information exchanges in conformance with national and industry standards, such as:
- Web services
- Global Reference Architecture (GRA)
- National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)
All OJB components implement GRA-conformant service specifications. Each service leverages the NIEM as its information model. Where GRA reference service specifications exist, the OJB has leveraged them to the extent practicable. OJB also secures its federated query components with an approach that conforms to the GFIPM user-to-system and system-to-system profiles.
Successes in the Field
Hawaii: Subscription/Notification for Probation/Parole
Through the OJB platform, Hawaii Integrated Justice Information Sharing (HIJIS) program offers an automatic Subscription/Notification service that provides probation/parole officers in the state with immediate electronic notifications when their clients are arrested. In the past, officers would wait to receive daily arrest reports, which they needed to review and subdivide by multiple supervision levels—a process which delayed notification of a client’s arrest and made it more difficult to keep the community safer from repeat offenders. Now, with real-time arrest notifications, probation/parole officers are able to use this information to take quicker and more decisive action, which increases public safety.
Practitioners in the field report offered their feedback to HIJIS:
Maine: Subscription/Notification for Probation/Parole
The State of Maine used the OJB platform to implement automated subscription/notification services for probation and parole officers. The service allows probation and parole officers to automatically subscribe to receive notifications when their probationers and parolees are arrested. Without such a capability, these officers do not have a reliable way to learn if their probationers and parolees are reoffending while on supervised release.
Practitioners in the field report finding a lot of value in this new capability, and offered their feedback to the Maine State Police:
Vermont: Subscription/Notification for Probation/Parole
Vermont also used the OJB platform to implement automated subscription/notification services for probation and parole officers. The service allows these officers to automatically subscribe to receive notifications any time their probationer or parolee is involved in an incident—whether as a suspect, witness, victim, etc. This capability provides these officers with quick intelligence regarding the current activity of their probationers and parolees while on supervised release.
According to the Vermont Department of Corrections, users of the email Incident Notification system supervise the following types of offenders:
- Domestic offenders: 23%
- Sex offenders: 15%
- Other high risk offenders: 15%
- Low-risk offenders: 23%
- Other role: 25%
The most common role the probationer or parolee plays in the incident notification? Most often as offender (51%) or person of interest (33%).
Nearly 80% of Incident Notification System users say it has been of benefit to the supervision of their caseloads. Another 15% were undecided (generally supervisors or district managers who do not carry a caseload). Users of the Incident Notification System were asked to explain how it has benefited their work. They responded as follows:
- 28% Learning of new behavior not being reported by offenders
- 22% Greater information as to the lives of offenders
- 11% Increased law enforcement contact disclosure by offenders
- 39% Other (e.g., parole/probation offers are aware of offender events due to the notification, even if they do not receive a call from law enforcement about a serious violation, and supervisors can see the behaviors of the offenders and staff handling of situations)
Practitioners in the field report offered their feedback as follows:
Use Cases
- Streamlined Federated Query: The State of Hawaii uses this capability to provide practitioners with one-click access to warrant, criminal history information, and firearms registrations. Vermont uses this capability to provide access to information in disparate law enforcement records management systems. Both members have plans to expand searches to additional data sources across the justice system.
- Real-time Subscription/Notification: The State of Hawaii is using this capability to create subscriptions for re-arrest of probationers and parolees, while Vermont is creating subscriptions for incidents involving probationers and parolees. These subscriptions are generated automatically out of probation and parole case management systems, and the notifications are delivered to officers in real-time via email, allowing them to coordinate with law enforcement and take other appropriate action immediately.
- System Interfaces to Trigger Subscriptions/Notifications: For example, an interface to a probation case management system can create a subscription when a new case is added. In this way, a probation officer can be notified if his supervised individuals have further law enforcement contact or are re-arrested.
- Web Portal (browser-based Interface): The States of Hawaii and Vermont use the portal to enable federated queries of criminal history records, warrants, incident reports, and firearm registrations. Both states are also taking advantage of the portal’s federated identity management capability to control user access and provide users with single sign-on capabilities. Both are also developing a manual subscription capability that will allow authorized practitioners to create and manage subscriptions via the portal.
- Security and Single Sign-on: The States of Hawaii and Vermont are leveraging this capability to secure their federated query and manual subscription implementations.
- Event Reporting: In the State of Maine, where this capability was first implemented, county jurisdictions are experiencing significant savings by eliminating duplicate data entry. Vermont is using the OJB event reporting service to populate a crime mapping application with up-to-date incident information. It notifies probation and parole officers of incidents involving supervisees, and informs mental health treatment providers of incidents resulting in arrests so they can make better treatment decisions.
- Data Analytics: Under a grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, OJBC is developing justice analytics tools on the OJB platform and pilot the tools in three jurisdictions. In the first project phase, this new capability will support Vermont’s implementation of a statewide pretrial services program, and assist its effort to combat drug-related crime. It will accomplish this by developing and implementing “dashboards” that make key performance measures available to policymakers and operational managers. It will also provide valuable general-purpose statistical analysis tools to justice practitioners and policymakers, who will be better equipped to leverage the power of operational justice data flowing across the OJB in making strategic decisions about the delivery of justice services in the state. In the second project phase, the OJBC will engage two new government jurisdictions (at the state, local, or tribal level) as Consortium members, and will develop additional analytical dashboards and performance measures to support justice initiatives in these jurisdictions.